The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The supplied pie charts indicate the shifts in annual expenditure in a certain UK school in three different years, 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Overall, teachers’ salaries were the highest proportion of annual spending percentage while insurance was consistent as the lowest. Besides, furniture and equipment experienced the fastest growth, yet other workers’ salaries saw a significant drop in percentage over the time observed.
On the one hand, in 1981 teacher’s salaries accounted for nearly half of total school costs. Even though this figure jumped by 10% in 1991 then slightly dropped to 45% in 2011, it remained the highest spending over the time observed. Insurance, however, was the lowest percentage with only 2% of total spending in 1981 and despite its increase in proportion, it remained the tiniest fraction in 1991 and 2001, with 3% and 8% respectively.
On the other hand, in 1981 other workers’ salaries stood at the second highest proportion with 28%, yet the figure steadily declined by 6% and 7% in 1991 and 2001. In contrast, the percentage of furniture and equipment started at 15% and vastly leveled off by 10% in 1991, which was 17% less than that of the second highest. However, it considerably rose to 23% within the next ten years and took over the second most position. Resources saw a fluctuation with the starting point of 15%. This figure slightly went up to 20% before dramatically declining by 11% in 2001, only 1% more than that of the lowest proportion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, so, then, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03629032258 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75256183293 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2736141801 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.545454545 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225798953228 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086864960537 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117055725273 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178342760394 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153032250015 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.