The pie charts below show the types of media used from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the proportion of 4 kinds of music media used over the course of 20 years, starting from 1990.
As can be seen from the graphs, it is immediately obvious that compact disk was used over the full period while cassette only appeared in 1990. It is also apparent that digital audio became the most popular type of media at the end of the period despite being introduced latest compared to 3 others.
In 1990, the percentage of compact disk occupied 55%. This figure reached the peak of 95% in 2000 years before decreasing to 35% 10 years later. Besides compact disk, the digital audio was the remaining sort of media existing in 2000 but comprised only 5% at that time. However, this number increased dramatically by 55% to 60% which was the highest rate at the end of the period.
20% was the allocation of the vinyl record in the first year of the time frame. After 10 years, this form was not welcomed totally but seemed to appear again and accounted for 5% in 2010. Cassette was another type of music media used in the first year of the period that took up 25% and then was not used anymore from then onwards
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, so, then, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48803827751 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21534717384 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574162679426 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2074494124 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14403458383 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058012009409 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618005053707 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106212888675 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625783249032 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.