The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the units of electricity produced by five different fuel sources in australia and france between 1980 to 2000.
Overall, australia produced more units of electricity in 1980 as compared to france. However ,In 2000, both countries produced equal number of units of electricity with the use of same fuels.
In 1980, australia produced 50 units by using coal which accounts for the half of the total production whereas 130 units of electricity was produced in 2000. A significant difference was observed for the production of electricity by the use of hydropower in both year's in australia that is 20 to 36 units. The natural gas and oil produced 20 and 10 units in 1980 which is ten times and 5 times more compared to 2000.
On the other hand, production of electricity units in 1980 by france while using nuclear power was 15 which increased by more than eight times in 2000. But, coal produced same amount of units in both year's. Moreover, oil produced 20 units in 1980 which increased by five in 2000. The use of hydro power and natural gas shows a significant decrease in the production of units of electricity from 1980 to 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tralia and france between 1980 to 2000. Overall, australia produced more units o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y in 1980 as compared to france. However ,In 2000, both countries produced equal n...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...electricity with the use of same fuels. In 1980, australia produced 50 units by ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imes and 5 times more compared to 2000. On the other hand, production of electri...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76354679803 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63760789694 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8608918961 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286547089262 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148821955409 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853406049734 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229274348715 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776768707146 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.