As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Iit is commonly believed by some that learning foreign language is useless due to the invention of technology as the monitors immediately translate one language to another in few minutes with proper accuracy. However, I disagree with this statement as the person should have to learn multiple languages rather than being dependent on computer.
To begin with, there are multifarious reasons to learn different languages. The preponderant one is that the learning languages provide a positive outcome to the brain of human being. By learning foreign languages, the people can develop their cognitive skills and critical skills too whereas, the use of computer to translate accurately can damage the power of brain. To exemplify, the Swedish scientists have done MRI of the brains of bilingual people and discovery reveal that learning language has visible effect on the brain.
Moreover, it is irrefutable that the computers are accurate, but it can not be used in every corner of the world due to inaccessibility. In this way, the folks that come in the contact of other nation people do not express their ideas, history and culture in simple way so that the others can follow them. Furthermore, the citizens who are totally reliable on the screen to convert one language to another would not be able to compete others. If they learn to speak and understand different languages,they would not found any difficulty even in the absence of technology.
In conclusion, learning language is outshined over use of computer to convert to second language as learning languages helps to civilization to explore themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ather than being dependent on computer. To begin with, there are multifarious re...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nguage has visible effect on the brain. Moreover, it is irrefutable that the com...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...speak and understand different languages,they would not found any difficulty even in ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2183908046 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87627458291 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578544061303 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.048962211 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.818181818 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225375926578 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838542540876 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536902071501 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148412246283 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511403931108 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.