As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, a debate raged over the necessity of learning a language in the era of computers. Some people assert that learning a foreign language is useless due to the invention of computer technology, while others oppose this statement by justifying the value of learning a language. I believe that person should learn different languages rather than being dependent on the technology. This essay will discuss the reasons followed by a lucid conclusion.
First and foremost, there is the multifarious reason to justify the above-said statement. The preponderant one is learning a language provides a positive outcome for the brain development. learning language can increase the size of the brain and improve cognitive skills in the human being and rely on any technology can only damage the power of the brain. To exemplify this, Swedish scientists have done MRI scan to monitor the brain of the people who are bilingual and discovery reveal that that learning a foreign language has a visible effect on the brain.
In addition to this, it is irrefutable that computers are accurate, but they cannot be used everywhere. If a person will get dependent totally on the technology, it will become cumbersome for him to work in the absence of it. For instance, if a person is working in a remote area, where computers are unavailable, then it will be complicated to do work over there and communicate with the local persons.
To recapitulate, it is indeed true that benefits of the computer are manifold, but learning a second language is beneficial for the brain development and also to manage the tasks at the time of non-availability of the computers and other means of help.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learning
...tive outcome for the brain development. learning language can increase the size of the b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (MRI) must be used with a third-person verb: 'scans'.
Suggestion: scans
... this, Swedish scientists have done MRI scan to monitor the brain of the people who ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00714285714 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93722588821 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1631418814 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191357988369 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692105654108 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516502579652 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118294398051 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444102935844 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.