Most countries do not recycle their waste like paper, glass, and aluminum cans. Why does this happen and what steps can be taken to encourage recycling?
It is irrefutable that the waste products such as paper, glass, and aluminum cans are not recycled to the newest one by many nations. In some countries, people argue that the recycling process is a complete wastage of time and money. Also, the other developing companies do not have recycling factories and effective labor. In this essay, I shall shed light on the reasons briefly and the initiatives that were taken to motivate people to do recycling.
To begin with, several people in some countries argue that the recycling process is a complete waste of time and money. As the recycling process has many important steps that should be followed to get the waste product as the newest one. Firstly, there is a need to collect waste material, for example, paper pieces, glass and aluminum cans from various places and ship it to the recycling industries. In this way, the recycling process takes a long time to clean, filter, and obtain the new product ready to use. Moreover, there is the wastage of money as well that is spending on the various recycling steps that need electricity and water etcetera. Also, the recycling process needs a number of workers who do different duties and gain money. Due to these reasons, several nations do not prefer to do recycling waste materials.
On the other hand, there are many nations in the world that are still developing and do not establish recycling factories the the waste products of paper, cans, and glasses can be converted to new ones. Also, they do not have skilled labor workers who can work effectively to recycle the waste materials. The developing countries do not have enough funds to ship the waste products to other developed countries for recycling and therefore they did not go through the recycling process.
There are several ways to motivate people in different countries to contribute to the recycling process. The government should aware people about the negative impacts of the waste material on the environment that does not decompose and causes various problems related to water pollution, soil pollution, and air pollution that have a direct impact on the human body. Furthermore, awareness campaigns should be conducted in which professional persons can give knowledge to the uneducated mortals that they have to collect the waste material and sell it which is the best method to save the environment from pollution and earn money as well.
In conclusion, it is mandatory for all nationalities to do recycling of waste goods to reduce their harmful impact on the environment. The administration should aware the people about recycling by conducting different campaigns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...nd do not establish recycling factories the the waste products of paper, cans, and glas...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...nd do not establish recycling factories the the waste products of paper, cans, and glas...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05251141553 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68631052866 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433789954338 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6341355726 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.473684211 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42105263158 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383422874593 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135260343528 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661698578712 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232480234468 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813076899437 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.