Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, women are occupied with their jobs all over the world. Hence, it is necessary that both men and women need to share housework equally. I completely argue with this statement.
One of the most significant reasons is that doing house chores together contributes to improve gender equality. It is clear that some stereotypes, which have been existed for a long time, argue that women must stay at home and do housework. Furthermore, they also have to look after children and take care of their parent-in-law. This stereotype can lead to a great deal of problems such as violence in house. Due to that, give husbands a chore is one of the most effective method to promote gender equality.
Another critical reason is that sharing household tasks plays an vital role in developing happiness in a family. It is certainly true that males as well as females have their employment. Because wives would not have spare time to do household choirs by themselves, she could not take care of their children carefully. Furthermore, because of the argument, parents may always have quarrel about housework in the present of their children. Consequently, some young generations will become juvenile offenders in the future. However, if wives and husbands finished household duty together, the chores would be done sooner. Thanks to that, parents will have more spare time in order to care for their young people.
In conclusion, even though both male occupations and female occupations need to be finished all days in many countries, it is logical that men and women have to take responsibility for doing household tasks equally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | Andet | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | tuongvytn2893 | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | vinay_vp372 | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-26 | hieunganngan | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-26 | hieunganngan | 47 | view |
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 47
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems 61
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In today s world private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...n is that sharing household tasks plays an vital role in developing happiness in a...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'quarrel'.
Suggestion: have always quarrel
...e, because of the argument, parents may always have quarrel about housework in the present of their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'quarreled', 'quarrelled'.
Suggestion: quarreled; quarrelled
...f the argument, parents may always have quarrel about housework in the present of their...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity for doing household tasks equally.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0594795539 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72791032254 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587360594796 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5846960211 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0625 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253300488776 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075975450427 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063882128643 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169823335099 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066879088404 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.