The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts describe units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France from 1980 to 2000. Overall, it is clear that the number of total electricity production in both countries showed an upward trend during the twenty years, from 100 units in 1980 to 170 units in 2000 in Australia and from 90 units to 180 units in France.
Starting with the first pie chart, coal produced the largest amount of electricity in 1980, at 50 units. Then its production rose dramatically 130 units in 2000, which was still at the highest position. The same trend can be seen in the production of electricity by hydro power, from 20 units (equal to that by natural gas) in 1980 to 36 units in 2000. However, the production of electricity by natural gas and oil declined to the lowest position (2 units) in 2000 from 20 and 10 units respectively.
Turning now to the second chart, the amount of electricity created by nuclear power increased dramatically to the highest point (126 units) in 2000 from a minor figure (15 units) in 1980. Meanwhile, a slight rise can also be seen in oil from 20 units to 25 units. By contrast, during the twenty years, the amount of electricity generated by natural gas and hydro power decreased to the lowest position at 2 units from 25 units and 5 units separately. The electricity production by coal remained stable in the meantime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000 from 20 and 10 units respectively. Turning now to the second chart, the amo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68049792531 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67429236849 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45643153527 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8398465773 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461080409043 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225811561381 0.103423049105 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181956232965 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365115627306 0.15604864568 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136554463318 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.