The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables illustrate how much Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas five European countries sold in 1999 and 2004. Overall, it is clear that the sales of bananas except in Sweden and Demark all showed an upward trend in the rest countries while that of coffee all experienced an increase in the five countries from 1999 to 2004.
Starting with coffee, the sales of coffee in the UK showed an obvious increase from 1.5 million euros in 1999 to 20 million euros in 2004. The sales of coffee in Switzerland was doubled from 3 in 1999 to 6 in 2004. The same trend can be seen in the sales of coffee in Belgium, but it rose less significantly from 1 to 1.7. The figure for coffee increased by the same 0.2 million euros in Denmark and in Sweden from 1.8 to 2 and from 0.8 to 1 respectively. Even if the figures for the five countries were almost similar in 1999, the sale of coffee in the UK was apparently much higher than that in the other four countries in 2004.
Turning now to bananas, the sale of bananas in Switzerland rose the most significantly from 15 million euros in 1999 to 47 million euros in 2004, the largest number among the five countries in 2004. The same trend can be seen in figures for the UK and Belgium, but it increased less significantly (from 1 to 5.5 in the UK and from 0,6 to 4 in Belgium individually).
However, the sales of bananas in Sweden and in Denmark both experienced a decrease from 1.8 to 1 and from 2 to 0.9 separately, both the smallest numbers in 2004. It is worthwhile to notice that the figures for Switzerland were always the largest either in 1999 or in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... rose less significantly from 1 to 1.7. The figure for coffee increased by the same...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 33.7804878049 195% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41077441077 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67564298842 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.380471380471 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9571683901 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255932768786 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142928003556 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946163239669 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183385276156 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757734905545 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.89 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.