The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The pie charts depict the generation of units of electricity by fossil fuels in two different countries in1980 and 2000. The striking feature of the chart is maximum consumption of coal in Australia.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that Australia surged its production by 70% in two decades. the use of coal was two-fold in 1980 while it became three-fold in 2000. Although, 30% generation was dependent on oil and natural gas which remained almost 2.5% in the latter period. However, Hydropower usage was approximately a uniform in both time intervals.
Moving further, France doubled its production in the given time period. In 1980, Natural gas and coal were equally preferred in the process while Hydropower was used by 5.5%. In the subsequent years, Nuclear power was extensively used in the production whereas the natural gas as well as hydropower was nominally used.
All-in-all, France produced a few units by consuming Nuclear power. On the contrary, Australia utilized coal to a great extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...d its production by 70% in two decades. the use of coal was two-fold in 1980 while ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19277108434 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83060744553 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0846500757 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3636363636 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234455669044 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842736756296 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788243769925 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149766125954 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975171662454 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.