The pie charts below units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Four pie chart illustrate different unit production of electricity which are run by fuel sourced in Australia and France in two distinct years 1980 and 2000.
Coal as the predominant source of energy for electricity production in Australia among 100 units in 1980, by 50%. After it, natural gas and hydro power was located at the second seat by 20% and oil had 10% share of energy sources. In 2000, the number of units had been decreased and for 170 units, and coal remain the main source by 130 stocks. Although the share of natural gas was dropped, the stocks of natural gas plus hydro power totally was close to 1980, due to increasing of hydro power stocks. Oil but remained at the end list similarly, with this difference that its shares had been decreased from 10 to 2.
French but had a diverse trend in amount of fuel consumption for electricity production. In 1980, coal and natural gas with 25 unit had the maximum share of energy source, and hydro power with 5 unit was at the end of list, while, total units was 90. In 2000, but, nuclear energy usage was increased dramatically, and with 126 unit of 180 total unit was located at the top list. Natural gas was fallen stunningly and beside hydro power was at bottom.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57466063348 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39035688206 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515837104072 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3379604065 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180116201797 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963543809823 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112579073382 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190426427327 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128179848605 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.