The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the amount of electricity generated from 5 main fuel resources in two nations over two decades.
It can be clearly seen that the generated units also increased in Australia and France despite the importance of natural gas decreased. Overall, one interesting fact was that the development of nuclear power was only applied in France.
Over 20 years, the total electricity generation were increased from 100 and 90 units to 170 units and 180 units significantly for Australia and France. The largest component was coal at 50 and 25 units independently in 1980, while it was still the biggest power generated source at 130 units sharply in Australia, as well as remained unchanged in France after 20 years.
The importance of natural gas was decreased in both nations from 20 and 25 units to 2 units also. As for generated Hydropower, it increased in Australia to 36 units gradually whereas there was just 2 units produced same as Natural gas in France in 2000. In Australia, oil was the lowest contributed source at 10 units in 1980be the lowest with natural gas at 2 units continually. Moreover, Nuclear power became the most popular in France by 111 units to 126 units suddenly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...nations from 20 and 25 units to 2 units also. As for generated Hydropower, it increa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90243902439 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79561992755 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7063758044 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28906058019 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126727166214 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538772204232 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168453291809 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536142877003 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.