The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India .Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data

Essay topics:

The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India .

Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data

The pie chart illustrates the comparison of the food habits of China and India with the average of the world in the year 2008.

In the three charts, the value of the processes of food and vegetables and fruits are showing a similar percentage. In contrast, animal food and nuts and seeds have significantly different values.

In India, 39% and in China, 34% of the population eats processed food, which is at a difference of 2% and 5% of the average world consumption. Vegetables and fruits eaten by Indian's are 23%, which is 6% less than the average, and the Chinese
population takes 3% more than the world average.

Animal Food consumption is approximately equal in India and World charts i.e., 27% and 26%, but Chinese people take only 15% i.e., 9% below the average. At last, The Indian and Chinese eats Nuts by a share of 11% and 19%, respectively, which is more than triple the world average.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'processes'' or 'process's'?
Suggestion: processes'; process's
... In the three charts the value of the processes food and vegetables and fruits are show...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 738.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55066994332 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9443707632 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265137301037 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147973785614 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103169410063 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183316652844 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952134799733 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.