The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
These pie charts illustrate the produciton share of electricity from the energy sources, namely nuclear, conventional thermal and renewables in Germany and France in 2009.
In Germany, conventional thermal contributed significantly more than those in France, roughly 60% and about one-tenth, respectively. However, in France (76%), nearly three as much electricity was generated from nuclear as in Germany (around 25%). There is a slight difference in Germany and in France produced electricity from renewable energy, approximately 18% and nearly 14%.
The renewable energy comprises hydroelectric, wind, biomass, and solar energy. In France, the majority renewables consist of hydroelectric power, which is used to produce electricity, 80%. Nevertheless, in Germany there are two major renewable sources: biomass (39.3%) and wind (36.9%). The solar energy accounts for the least proportion for both countries.
Overall, Germany primarily relied on conventional thermal in comparison with France which produced the majority electicity from nuclear power. When it comes to renewables, France mostly applied hydroelectricity, however Germany utilized both biomass and wind in similar amount.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02366863905 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13588254279 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627218934911 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4701543939 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221993639619 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903527705163 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783186889421 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150252591894 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068721405333 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.34 11.4140731707 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02366863905 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13588254279 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627218934911 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4701543939 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221993639619 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903527705163 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783186889421 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150252591894 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068721405333 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.34 11.4140731707 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.