The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The two given maps denote the layout of a university's sport centre at the present and its future plan after reconstruction.
Overall, it is obvious that the gym is going to be bigger. Sport centre will have two extra changing rooms which one of the is going to be located under leisure pool and the other one will be situated below dance studio. Two dance station will be added. Some new facilities are going to located in the future plan namely; leisure pool, sport shop, café and sport hall. Outdoor courts will be omitted from the new plan.
Despite current plan of sport centre which has two outdoor courts in two opposite sites, it is considered to have a new area for leisure pool and on the opposite site a new zone for sport hall in front of two dance studios.The central pool and seating benches as well as reception and old changing room will have no change.It is clear that novel places is designed for new plan where are in front of reception in two different parts: one of them is café and the other one is sport shop. It worth nothing that the gym is going to be bigger but the location will be the same.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...The two given maps denote the layout of a universitys sport centre at the present...
^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'locate'
Suggestion: locate
...added. Some new facilities are going to located in the future plan namely; leisure pool...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...port hall in front of two dance studios.The central pool and seating benches as wel...
^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...d old changing room will have no change.It is clear that novel places is designed ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40865384615 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18934833155 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485576923077 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 137.540391795 43.030603864 320% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155166960976 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793704739808 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549385740239 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136867625002 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428868016177 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.