The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The plans illustrate comparison of grange park’s current plan and former plan built in 1920 in Arnold avenue.
Overall, expert the northeast rose garden and main entrances, entire park plan has changed and even some improvement built underground in Crange park since 1920. However, despite the changes made in former plans, the concept of commercial space for entertainment and water-related creatures are still on the plan.
Furthermore, seats location has moved into center of the park, surrounding the rose garden by removing fountain, which used to located in the corner of the parks. Then, café and children’s playing area added on today’s plan replacing the 1920’s rose garden and water plants pond on northwest of the park.
Additionally, water related creatures namely pond has moved into the east-west of the park by changing pond into water creature. Also, for car parking, new underground entrence has made right below the water creature.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, still, then, even so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38410596026 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70325252783 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8061849887 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202442244461 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099403555531 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073324475553 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135332211478 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583946822799 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.