The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The infographics depict a transformation of a public called Grange Park before and after the constructions of some facilities since 1920.
Overall, this public venue has become more developed with a range of new facilities, including a new café, a children playground, a water feature, and an amphitheatre.
To begin with, in the entire western part of the park, there have been some noticeable changes. Firstly, all seating areas have been removed. An amphitheatre was built in replacement of the stage. Furthermore, one of the rose gardens was removed. Lastly, the fountain in the central area was substituted by a square rose garden surrounded by seats on all sides.
Turning to the other part of the maps, the rose garden to the side of the upper entrance along with its adjacent pond was clear up. The space was then reutilised for the construction of a Café and a children’s recreational zone. In addition of the glasshouse was demolished in order to give space for the water feature while the seats next to the glass house have been replaced by the entrance leading to the underground parking lot. Apart from the abovementioned changes, both entrances facing Arnold and Eldon avenues have witnessed no changes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... and a children’s recreational zone. In addition of the glasshouse was demolished in ord...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, lastly, so, then, while, apart from, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07389162562 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94531026901 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610837438424 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4989343073 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701376569079 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025783211597 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405205558355 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.052519980708 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419984837757 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.