the plans below show a public park when it forst opened in 1920 and the same park today.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate some changes of the same Grange park from the past and now. It is clearly seen that either the main parts or the equipment developed over the period time of over 100 hundred years.
In 1920, there was a beautiful fountain in the center of the park where two entrances lied in front and back of it. A stage located in the west of the fountain which was designed for musicians, therefore it was surrounded by audience seats in four different corners. There were a rose garden and a pond full of water plants in the northeast of the fountain. Also, a small glasshouse lied in the near of the south entrance.
Nowadays, here are a certain of huge development in the playground. The size of rose garden has become much larger and it has been relocated to the middle of the park with enough seats ,where it was the place of a fountain. People established an amphitheatre in order to hold concerts instead of a musician stage. The pond and garden now has changed to a cafe and children’s play area in the northeast of the park, and there is a new water feature in the southeast of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Grange) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...ustrate some changes of the same Grange park from the past and now. It is clearly se...
^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the middle of the park with enough seats ,where it was the place of a fountain. Pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44117647059 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51567557652 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563725490196 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1754297705 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120413536156 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429265493234 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492262116169 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798930142984 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159544858863 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.