the plans below show the site of an airport and how it will look after redevelopment in a year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given diagram illustrates the site plan of Southwest airport before and after refurbishment.
Overall, The departure and arrival entrance remains the same, while the future airport will have more number of gates, compared to the present one. It will also include a new mode of transporation between the gates as well as some new features were added in the lobby before entering into the customs area.
In the present plan, there are 8 gates, in which gates 1 to 3 are connected by walkway. In the departure area there is a cafe near to the security passport control and directly opposite to it there is a check-in counter.
In the future plan, there are so many new shops and ammenities added such as new ATM, car hire and Cafe in the arrival part of the Southwest airport. While in the depature area there is change of location of the cafe and check-in, and bag drop will be newly added. One of the stricking feature of the new plan is, they will have 18 gates compared to 8 gates at present.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customs'' or 'custom's'?
Suggestion: customs'; custom's
...d in the lobby before entering into the customs area. In the present plan, there are...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e to it there is a check-in counter. In the future plan, there are so many new ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5635359116 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43960034176 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0596164177 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124697970038 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589235435355 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442053917748 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872419224246 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480230283665 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.