The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university.
The given diagrams represent the interior and arrangement of undergraduates' dormitory, including single and double rooms at an Australian university.
To begin with, as can be seen from two plans, both kinds of rooms have some similarities in equipment and facilities. It is clear that bathroom, television, windows, and kitchen implements such as microwave, sink, and stove are fundamental. Besides, the length of student rooms is the same, at 6 meters.
A more detailed look at the picture reveals many differences between accommodation for one person and that for two people. A single room is much smaller as its width is 1.5 meters less than a double one. Furthermore, a room for two undergraduates is double in the number of beds and study desks. This kind of accommodation also has an extra set of table and chairs as well as a bookshelf. The private areas of students are isolated by a cupboard in the center of the room.
To conclude, a double room at an Australian university is significantly more functional and convenient than a single flat. As a result, the rent prices are different: While it costs 200 dollars per week for one undergraduate, it takes 150 dollars more for two students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...o people. A single room is much smaller as its width is 1.5 meters less than a dou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, look, so, well, while, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95566502463 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0808702518 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610837438424 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7371657634 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4545454545 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437713344708 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147736645354 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791640374477 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235464000163 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080969511135 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.