The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The illustrations provide information about how a theatre changed in 2010 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the theatre was extended to include some new rooms such as a hall, media, showers, and restaurants.
In 2010, an auditorium was situated in the center of the theatre. To the left of the auditorium, there was storage while a media was behind the auditorium. Besides, when you entered the main entrance, you reached a café on your right whereas an admin office and a ticket office were on your left.
In 2012, the auditorium stayed unchanged, and there was an enlargement of the stage. Additionally, the storage was replaced by media and some small showers. The restaurant was constructed where the admin office and the ticket office used to be. There was an admin ticket behind the restaurant, and the café made way for a ticket office. Furthermore, there was an appearance of storage next to the stage and the hall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...the auditorium, there was storage while a media was behind the auditorium. Besides, whe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8375 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73264409501 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3749860335 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824540570847 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458460921924 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714972641022 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766815506247 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932174603202 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.