The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The plans illustrate a park whose name is Grange when it was opened for the first time in 1920 and then what it is looked nowadays.
Overall, apart from several extractions, some amenities have still been remained as well as demolishing a number of services.
In the first map, there were two entrances on top and bottom of it which have not been changed after the construction. A fountain was placed on the center of the park and to its left was a stage for musicians. On the top right of the corner, there were pond for water plans as well as a rose garden. Against those facilities, a glasshouse was located besides seats on its right. Below the stage there was a rose garden midway two seats which were exactly the same for the unlike corner on the top.
Nowadays, although all the seats were deteriorated from the park, other services have been altered to new ones. Such as old fountain which has been replaced to a rose garden surrounding seats. Similarity, stage has been transformed to an Amphitheatre for concerts. One café and a children’s play area have been substituted instead of old rose garden and play area on the top right. Finally, a water feature which has access to an entrance to underground car park has located in the place of glasshouse.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, look, so, still, then, well, apart from, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64444444444 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60391348399 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528888888889 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.1114947784 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0833333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153099047838 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580717037681 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867360892488 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11670675364 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122961059907 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.