The should below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These two tables illustrate how many Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas were sold in 1999 and 2004. Units are measured in millions of euros.
Overall, the sales of coffee had increased in these four countries (UK, Switzerland, Belgium and Sweden) but in Denmark, it went down a little. Regarding the sales of bananas, all countries except Sweden experienced an increase in bananas sale.
First of all, when taking a look further, we can see that sales of coffee in UK increased significantly from 1.5 million in 1999 to 20 million in 2004 which is more than 10 times and Sweden's coffee sale only went up 0.2 which is the least from 1999 to 2004. On the other hand, coffee sales in Denmark slipped down a little from 1.8 million in 1999 to 2 million in 2004.
Next, there is a similar trend in bananas sales of these five countries which means only one country experienced a drop of bananas sale. Switzerland's bananas sale almost tripled from 1999 to 2004 and that of Belgium even increased 7 times while Sweden's bananas sale went down from 1.8 million in 1999 to 1 million in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...d Sweden but in Denmark, it went down a little bit. Regarding the sales of bananas, all co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...all countries except Sweden experienced its an increase in bananas sale. When t...
^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... coffee sales in Denmark slipped down a little bit from 1.8 in 1999 to 2 in 2004. Ther...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61878453039 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60338854964 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5918519812 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217546724654 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109872676355 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582816837666 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149458375098 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401500173204 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.