Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Nowadays, many children use gadgets more time daily. This scenario is due to more freedom for children by their parents, and I believe this is a negative development because it retards mental growth and isolates them inside the home.
The young generation has needed more freedom from guardians in recent years. Due to this, parents provide smartphones to their children, where they play games and some times addicted to harmful activities. Moreover, the hectic lifestyle of adults is also responsible for freedom, as this leads to more addiction to digital platforms and prevents exposure to the outer environment. For instance, most Nepalese students who study at primary schools rely on mobile than on sports, as their parents do not force for physical activities. Thus, children prefer virtual means as compared to real ones.
Mobile phones prevent young people from a social lifestyle. When they become habituated to artificial technology, that hampers mental growth and development. Moreover, a sedentary lifestyle prevents the performance of young students in the classroom. Children want to stay within the house and do not want exposure to the community, which isolates them within a single cell. In addition, it leads to poor moral education and ethical growth and might make mentally disabled people in the future. For example, recent studies reveal that continue stalking on mobile phones makes children mentally and socially weak. Hence, addiction to digital technology makes growing children unsocial.
It can be concluded that more spending on gadgets is due to children's freedom of choice, and it restricts performance and mental growth. Therefore, I believe it is a negative development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41947565543 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7152963961 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576779026217 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9036596773 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4375 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184221206486 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550759620812 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663326916128 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123146916214 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625629010374 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 40.7170731707 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.