The growth of the fast food industry has, without doubt, impacted on the eating habits and the help of many societies around the world. Diabetes, high cholesterol, heart and respiratory problems are all on the rise due to Fatty and sugar rich food. How are ever, the question is whether higher tax Would improve this situation or not.
From an economic point of view, higher tax might seem sensible. In countries such as the USA, Australia and Britain, the healthcare system spends a large part of its budget on people with the diet-Related health problems. It could be argued that these people have a Costa there on illness because of their choice of food. In this case, why should they expect the state to pay for their treatment? The text could you help fund the healthcare system the. related health problems. It could be argued that these people have Costa there on illness because of their choice of food. In this case, why should they expect the state to pay for their treatment? The text could you help fund the healthcare system .
However,We also need to consider which socia-Economic group consumed fast food as the main part of their title. Statics indicate that lower income group eat more of this food then wealthier people. One possible reason for this is th economic group consumed fast food as the main part of their title. Statics indicate that lower income group eat more of this food then wealthier people. One possible reason for this is that fast food is a far cheaper than fresh produce this is because many governments of a larger subsidies to farmers who provide products for the fast food industry, such as corn, wheat and beef. Fruit and veggie tables, on the other hand, are not subsidised. Research suggests that many family simply cannot afford to buy healthy food or pay higher taxes on fast food. For them, fast food is not a choice but a necessity.
In conclusion, imposing a higher tax on fast food does not seem to be the answer. If the government Chose to do this, it would only lead to greater power tea and family is facing further hardship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: THE_SENT_END[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...uld you help fund the healthcare system the. related health problems. It could be ar...
^^^^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Related
...ou help fund the healthcare system the. related health problems. It could be argued tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 701, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ould you help fund the healthcare system . However,We also need to consider whic...
^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , We
...p fund the healthcare system . However,We also need to consider which socia-Econo...
^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people. One possible reason for this is that fast food is a far cheaper than fre...
^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun family seems to be countable; consider using: 'many families'.
Suggestion: many families
... not subsidised. Research suggests that many family simply cannot afford to buy healthy foo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 5.60731707317 589% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 965.302439024 178% => OK
No of words: 366.0 196.424390244 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69398907104 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30650369904 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 106.607317073 167% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486338797814 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 283.868780488 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 8.94146341463 246% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5623597991 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0909090909 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301745559118 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908019927745 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506289436773 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177289690557 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392024042591 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.