The table and chart give information on pilots in 3 years. Summarize information, report main feature and compare relevant information.
The table and bar charts provide information about pilot in one country for the following years, 1996, 2006 and 2016 based on gender and age.
Over the years, the number of pilots in one country increased in numbers. The gender bar chart depicts that the female pilots dominated in numbers compared to males in all the three years. The age bar graph shows a comparison of pilots in one country categorized as pilot s under 30 years of age and the other over 30 years.
Furthermore, it can also be noted that the gap between males to female’s ratio decreased over every 10 years. While the percentage of males grew from 25% to nearly 40% in 20 years, the female pilot’s percentage decrease from staggering 75% in 1996 to 60% by 2016. Further, in 1996 the male to female ratio was 25:75 which changed in 2016 to 40:60 with the increase in male pilots. The age graph reveals that the pilots under 30 were the highest, nearly 30% more in 1996 which changed in 2006 where over 30 years of age was a larger by nearly 20%. However, this gap reduced and was nearly at 50:50 by 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars of age and the other over 30 years. Furthermore, it can also be noted that t...
^^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...educed and was nearly at 50:50 by 2016.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4696969697 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23919710457 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.476359818 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116184121483 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541324571473 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622917592095 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111725632613 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718125966991 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.