The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
The columnar chart depicts the different sources of police funds for the years 2017 and 2018, on the other hand the pie charts represents the various expenditures of this budget for the same years. The values are represented in millions for the former and percent for the latter.
Overall, the year 2018 has seen higher total budget than compared to 2017. Additionally, the maximum fraction of the money is spent in salaries.
First and foremost, the national government provides the majority of the bucks in either of the years, which varies almost by a factor of 2 million within the two years. Secondly, the local taxes had a lesser contribution of about 91.2 million which has raised to 102.3 million in a year. The money from other sources like grants, contribute only about 38 million euros approximately.
Money is spent least on technology which accounts for 14% in 2018, which is slightly more than the double of 2017. Furthermore, the funds dissipated in facilities like buildings and transport remain unchanged over the year. The salaries of the officers and staff accounted for exactly three quarters which decreased to 6% in 2018.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
...illion euros approximately. Money is spent least on technology which accounts for 14% in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03664921466 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61376652453 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602094240838 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8547294419 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163595914814 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063341252023 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625076987054 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103736899583 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642310427504 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.