The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities.
Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below illustrates the actual and predicted populations in three particularly city namely: Sao Paulo, Jakarta and Shanghai.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that, they predicted that all the cities civilian number would increase but in fact, there was an upward trend in the number of resident in both sao paulo and jakarta while it was an downward trend in the shanghai ‘s population.
According to the table, in 1990 the inhabitants number of sao paulo came top with 15 million whereas jakarta came bottom with 9,5 million. In addition , sao paulo ‘s population was expected to went up to 24 million and this figure in jakarta was 14 million, less than 10 million in comparison with the sao paulo ‘ number. However, between 1990 and 2000 experienced a significant rise in both sao paulo and jakarta from 15 to 18 million and 9,5 to 11,5 million people respectively and these number were all lower than the prediction.
Meanwhile, the number of resident in shanghai stood at 13.5 million in 1990 and this figure was predicted to reach 17 million in 2000. By contrast, the population of shanghai fell to 12.5 million ten year later.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...both sao paulo and jakarta while it was an downward trend in the shanghai 's ...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...karta while it was an downward trend in the shanghai 's population. According to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ame bottom with 9,5 million. In addition , sao paulo 's population was expect...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91370558376 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59190816975 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553299492386 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8728373775 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0780811602833 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541685052877 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690906009185 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079959931887 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797250604863 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.