The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The table illustrates the figure of workers and manufactories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. The numbers of employees were grouped by male and female, then summarizing together.
As can be seen from the table, male accounted for the dominated proportion almost throughout the haft decade period, excepted in 1861. In general, the total number of total workforces and group of each gender was gradually continuously decreased. During 50 years from 1851 to 1901, the male and female workers dramatically dropped more than 9 times and 6 times respectively.
By contrast, factories increased over 2.5 times from 225 factories in 1851 to 600 ones in 1901. However, in this period, there was a significant fluctuation of quantity of manufactories, rose from 227 plants in 1861 to the peak at 721 plants in 1881, then falling to 600 plants in 1901.
In conclusion, the workforce in England and Wales considerably and constantly dropped, contrary with the rise of plants during the fifty-years from 1861 to 1901.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than 9 times and 6 times respectively. By contrast, factories increased over 2....
^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...times from 225 factories in 1851 to 600 ones in 1901. However, in this period, there...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12574850299 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93085482417 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4624322935 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347414660069 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15160074919 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117902565819 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216887279025 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104493428981 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.