The table illustrates the amount of recreation time in units of hour seven age ranges spent in a basic year in Someland.
The initial impression from the chart is the popularity of watching TV/videos amongst all groups of ages, whilst the cinema is not commonly chosen. It is also apparent that teenagers allocate the highest number of hours for their pastime per year.
Regarding watching TV/videos, the youngest age bracket typically spend more time on this activity than their older counterparts, with the figures being 1200 compared to 1100. Moving to the category of cinema, by contrast with the previous one, people in Someland spend far less time on going to the cinema, hovering from 25 to 100 hours annually. A similar pattern could be seen in this sort conveyed by 100 hours at the cinema of the young and the 70s.
There is a correlation between age and the level of participation in four categories remaining. The engagement level in socializing with over 4 people and group exercise/sport decrease with age, shrinking from 450 hours and the older age bracket almost unengaging. Meanwhile, the middle-aged tend to take part in under-4-people socialising as well as individual exercise with typically 250-300 hours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... people in Someland spend far less time on going to the cinema, hovering from 25 to 100 ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12871287129 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83305028274 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638613861386 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8365920008 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142494946472 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612831332839 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066015839099 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989601435934 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555768819321 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.