The map illustrates the significant development of a village called Chorleywood from 1868 to 1994. Overall, the transportation system was improved by constructing a motorway and a railway, going with the appearance of numerous areas around the intersections and along the roads of the village.
The origin map of the village was actually simple consisting of two main roads crossing each other, a small area located near one of the roads. In the first period of the village's development, there was an appearance of a railway expanded to the East and West, intersecting one of the main roads, at the same time, a site built around the intersection just mentioned above.
1909 witnessed the debut of railway road which located in the South of the village. Approximately ten years later, new areas were built up around the Chorleywood Station and the cross-section nearby. At the end of the 1922-1970 period, besides the previous traffic system, a motorway was built and intersecting with them, creating a checked pattern between these paths. In the latest period mentioned in the map, it showed the greatest changes of Chorleywood village through the emergence of numerous new areas gathering around the intersections created by the motorway, which obviously conveyed the significant development of Chorleywood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'villages'' or 'village's'?
Suggestion: villages'; village's
...f the roads. In the first period of the villages development, there was an appearance of...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2966507177 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05299903295 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55023923445 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1514513319 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153773028154 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770336597404 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850824817931 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113850441711 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00900804547443 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.