Due to the fact that the quantity of visitors and the development of tourism bring out the significant rising need for flights. In this essay, I would discuss about the severe influences which this phenomenon inflicts to the environment and several relevant solution for the issue.
The primary effect caused by airliner is an excessive amount of fumes released into the atmosphere. According to scientific researches, the carbon footprint from aircraft' engine makes up an enormous number for the adverse impact on the polluted environment. Coinciding with the increase in flying demands, the rise of toxic emissions is responsible for loads of natural disasters such as acid rain and climate change as well, which damages not only human beings, on the contrary, also destroy the balanced ecosystem. Further examination, non-renewable sources of power is made full used to operate an influx of commercial aircraft. The over-exploitation of these sources would intensively cause the exhaustion of power in the future and inflict to human living as well as producing activities.
However, there are something people could do to deal with this aspect. Developing and utilizing alternative energy including biofuels or renewable energy, plainly, would be a realistic choice for aviation. These sorts of sources mentioned assist to reduce the emissions dumped into the air, at the same time, mitigate the reliance on fossil fuels. By applying this solution, the quality of air could be improved and granting a sustainable development for human in the course of time. Moreover, replacing the current type of aircraft by fuel-efficient airplanes that release roughly zero emission additionally has a beneficial effect on the environment. A good example for this is the presence of Shinkansen, a train using electromagnetism technology, has the speed equaling with an aircraft, by contrast no toxic fumes from the engine and decreasing amount of fuels used.
In conclusion, the tourism and the increasing number of people travelling result in the growing demand for more flights which bring up a number of intensive effects on the climate. However, I assume that there are a plethora of methods could be applied to cope with the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34277620397 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97836522654 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592067988669 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0374726597 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.733333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249163736986 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755055550381 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776458884488 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168404358012 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118522164834 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.