The table below gives details of world electricity production by renewable sources in the four years between 2009 and 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest amount of electricity was produced by Hydraulic source in all years and that the amount of electricity produced by all renewable sources increased over the given period.
Hydraulic source produced 3329 TWh in 2009 then for the following four years the amount of produced electricity rose gradually to 3363.4 TWh in 2012. Wind and Bio-mass sources produced fairly similar amount of electricity which accounted fo 276.4 and 246.8 respectively. Then, while Wind production increased significantly over the next 4 years to reach 534 TWh, Bio-mass production experienced a gradual growth and comprised of 326.2 in 2012.
The electricity produced by Geothermal sources stood at 67.4 KWh in 2009 for the following four years the production raised slightly to 70.4. Solar produced the least amount of energy among all sources in 2009 which constituted 21 KWh, after four years the amount of electricity produced by Solar raised by five times.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24203821656 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78242631941 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515923566879 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7267051444 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.6 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276605037111 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160262937047 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547578753675 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201960023808 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268255560573 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.