The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000

The table illustrates how many miles an average British citizen traveled per year using different means of transport in 1985 and 2000.

Overall, what stands out from the table is that cars were by far the most popular mode of transportation in England, while taxis and bicycles were the least.

First of all, whereas in 1985 a person traveled approximately 4740 miles per year using all modes of travel, in 2000 this figure surged to 6475 miles. The main contributor to this increase was a car’s usage, as the distance traveled by this transport rose from 3199 miles to 4806 miles.

Turning to the other modes of travel, both in 1985 and in 2000 the next three most frequently used categories, apart from the “others”, were local buses, trains and walking, with 274, 366 and 237 miles in 2000 respectively. Taxis and bicycles were the least popular, with only 42 miles traveled in 2000 by the former and 41 miles by the latter.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, whereas, while, apart from, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8527607362 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68504276085 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5178799433 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218530657696 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115447404075 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488806637771 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136867460353 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199816961791 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.