There is no doubt that waste management is an important issue in our society. While some people believe that the only way to recycle more is to make it a legal requirement, I do not agree with this point of view.
First of all, although recycling has its undeniable benefits, such as the reduction of pollution, obliging people to do something, in my opinion, should be a last resort. This is because before enforcing new laws, other methods should be tried first. For instance, in Russia there is very little known about recycling, so the first logical step will be to create a campaign which will describe the advantages of this process. In contrast, if the Russian government tried to enforce laws related to recycling now, this most likely would result in riots, as it might be assumed to be another way of unreasonably taking money from its citizens.
Moreover, governments should create appropriate infrastructure before implementing these laws. This, unfortunately, is not always possible, as it requires substantial investments in these facilities. As a result, ministers often have to choose between fighting the global warming and more down-to-earth problems, such as poor roads or underfunding of hospitals. Most of the time the authorities choose the latter. If, on the other hand, the infrastructure is not in place when the legislation is enacted, this likely will result in a disaster, as people simply will not know where to put their garbage.
To conclude, I disagree with the view that new laws should be made to increase recycling because before doing so, other methods of encouragement should be tried and appropriate infrastructure should be developed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in contrast, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16117216117 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99248343868 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59706959707 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1325533606 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186123194379 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650157201317 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904059548447 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132048253823 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105739271002 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.