Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.
In this modern world, although there is abundant exploration in science and technology, some people raise concern about the amount of waste from homes are not recycled. They further claim that the key aspect to increase recycling process at home is to enforce a law.
Looking at the prevailing conditions, in many houses, the waste is not recycled. The people may not be aware of the importance of recycling and its benefits or may not bother about the environment. If it’s the later case, and still people follow the conventional method of disposal of waste, they should be made aware of the consequences of their actions. Despite public awareness and campaigns if no recycling is carried in the home, the trend should be changed by involving the government.
Due to enormous amount of waste collected from homes, its challenging for the government to tackle the waste in regard to disposal and its associated impacts to the environment. Only, if the requirement of recycling is made mandatory, there may be a reduction in wastage and well as recycle process may happen at homes. If the rules are not adhered, penalty fees should be slashed on the failing homes. For instance, there was persistent information from government to wear safety belt while driving. People did not abide and only after the introduction of violation fees, people started to wear seat belt. Seat belts are related to own safety of the individual and has not impact to environment, whereas in regard to recycling process, it has detrimental effects to both individual and society.
In conclusion, at first stage, the government may enact a law and random sanity checks to be conducted by the government officials. If any violations are noted, a strict penalty fees to be applied which will create a fear for those who are not adhering to the rules. If the above is implemented, during the course of time, recycling becomes habitual and imperative custom of daily life. Subsequently, yields a positive effect to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'impacted'.
Suggestion: impacted
...wn safety of the individual and has not impact to environment, whereas in regard to re...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...the rules. If the above is implemented, during the course of time, recycling becomes habitual and im...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, so, still, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01194029851 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83156632927 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540298507463 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0604960448 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266189825014 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804127012201 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546034346903 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168132624818 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728622457542 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.