The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
This table illustrates the data about trend in different modes of transportation used in England from 1985 to 2000.
Overall, the greatest distance travelled in miles per capita annually, is by car. However, the number of bicycle users and people travelling by foot has decreased over the period of time. As people also prefer other modes of travelling which has tremendously caused an increase in the average number of miles covered by a person per year over the past 15 years.
The table shows that cars were most commonly used for travelling from one place to another. The average distance covered by a person was 3199 miles in 1985 which increased up to 4806 miles in the year 2000. The use of local bus has decreased to over a half during this time period. The average distance covered by bicycle and walking has also fallen to 11 and 18 miles between 1985 and 2000 respectively.
However, the distance travelled by long distance bus and train has increased to nearly three quarters in miles. A great proportion of people have used taxis and other means of transportation for the purpose of travelling. To sum up, the total average distance covered in miles by a person in 1985 has drastically increased from 4740 miles to 6475 miles over the period of 15 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Pgreat | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | ralfs | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | alona2501 | view | |
| 2019-03-27 | Sadia Akram | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sadia Akram | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topicShould wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsi 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods inBritain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...avelling by foot has decreased over the period of time. As people also prefer other modes of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... has decreased over the period of time. As people also prefer other modes of trave...
^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ased up to 4806 miles in the year 2000. The use of local bus has decreased to over ...
^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to over a half during this time period. The average distance covered by bicycle and...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7963800905 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57218228379 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484162895928 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4509146682 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3636363636 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111692974258 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515067680058 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529990215365 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950690188847 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647177527784 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.