The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in
England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows various modes of travel used by people of England between the years 1985 and 2000.
Overall, the average distance travelled by each person using different means increased from 1985 to 2000. During all this years carwas the most used medium for travellling.
Talking about car, the average miles travelled by each person had an increase of about 1600 miles from 1985 to 2000. Apart from this, travelling by train and long distance bus also had a significant growth. The distance travelled by taxi on average incremented more than thrice from 13 to 42 miles. Moreover, other modes of travelling also became popular in England showing an average increase of about 135 miles compared to 1985.
On the other hand, using bicycles or walking to the destination decreased during these 15 years. However, a greater decrease can be seen in people travelling by local bus as the average miles per person reduced from 429 in 1985 to 274 in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...increased from 1985 to 2000. During all this years carwas the most used medium for t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, apart from, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91975308642 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39745489447 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.5476176508 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158660457111 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767341297876 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673504511387 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117326403041 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650964423868 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.