The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following table shows how the modes of travel changed in England in a 15-year period of 1985 to 2000.
As can be clearly observed from the table, travel modes can be divided into three distinctive groups including environment friendly, private, and public modes. The first group consisted of walking and bicycle. Both of them experienced a slight decline, from 255 and 51 miles in 1985 to 237 and 41 miles in 2000, respectively.
Using car to travel was placed in private mode. Average miles which were travelled by car per person per year was the highest among other modes in both 1985 by 3199 and 2000 by 4806 miles. The third group included local and long-distance bus, train, and taxi. Unlike local bus, which its average distance declined dramatically from 429 in 1985 to 274 in 2000, other modes of this group witnessed different levels of rise. Train had the most distance mileage in this group in 2000 by 366 miles, although its distance was 289 in 1985. Followed by long-distance bus, with 54 miles of 1985 and 124 miles in 2000, and taxi started from 13 miles in 1985 and reached 42 miles in 2000.
Overall, it is clear from the table that other modes of travel went up significantly between 1985 to 2000, from 450 to 585 miles. Meanwhile, the total distance which was travelled by all modes observed a remarkable increase. It was 4740 in 1985 in comparison with 6475 miles in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55060728745 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38047729045 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485829959514 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 247.0 22.4926829268 1098% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1124.0 112.824112599 996% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 247.0 22.9334400587 1077% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 27.0 5.23603664747 516% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193707422666 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193707422666 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166970822194 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688482955086 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 123.5 13.2329268293 933% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -153.85 61.2550243902 -251% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 96.1 10.3012195122 933% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.59 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.83 8.06136585366 234% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 100.8 10.9970731707 917% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 124.0 11.0658536585 1121% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.