The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in
England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the average distance that people in Britain travelled use different forms of transport between 1985 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that the people in Uk using all modes of transport increased significantly in the years 1985 and 2000, car was by far the most used form of transport in years .
In 1985, people travelled 3199 by car, and this rose to 4806 in the year 2000. The figures for travelled by train and other means like bus, taxi also increased from 1985 to 2000. Travel by taxi saw the most significant change, with more than a threefold increase from 13 per person per year in 1985 to 42 in 2000, notably more than long-distance bus doubling compared to 1985 and 2000
There were a significant drop with three modes of transport: walking, cycling and local buses. In 1985, Britons walked an average of 255 but this had dropped to 237 in 2000. Bicycle use fell from 51 to 41 during the 2000s period, while local bus usage average per person decreased from 429 to 274 over the 15-year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...between 1985 and 2000. Overall, it can be seen that the people in Uk using all ...
^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ignificantly in the years 1985 and 2000, car was by far the most used form of tra...
^^
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the most used form of transport in years . In 1985, people travelled 3199 by c...
^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f transport in years . In 1985, people travelled 3199 by car, and this rose to...
^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears . In 1985, people travelled 3199 by car, and this rose to 4806 in the ye...
^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lled 3199 by car, and this rose to 4806 in the year 2000. The figures for trave...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 4806 in the year 2000. The figures for travelled by train and other means like ...
^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by train and other means like bus, taxi also increased from 1985 to 2000. Travel...
^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h more than a threefold increase from 13 per person per year in 1985 to 42 in 200...
^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 1985, Britons walked an average of 255 but this had dropped to 237 in 2000. Bic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60540540541 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38525551385 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7514639729 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141435841687 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819130029066 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439524940491 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974634014035 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464140652282 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.