The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given tabular chart highlights the information about the seven favorite pastimes of people of eight distinct countries aged from 30-50 years old. The data is calibrated in per centum which is clearly and coherently represented.

Overall, it is evident that, reading is the only activity in which all the countries have participated whereas, least favourite pastimes is sleep.

It can be seen that canada has participated in all the activities either it is be tv or sleep. Moreover, France is looking less interesting in all the other activities except: reading, hobbies and music. After that, Australia and Korea not only participated in tv and sport but also in music, beach and sleep.

As far as trend is concerned, Japan neither participated in tv and sport nor in other pastimes except: reading while the favourite pastimes of most of the people is reading. In the country like china the number of people who are interested in hobbies, music and beach are 50%, 0% and 5% respectively.

Votes
Average: 4.4 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
... the countries have participated whereas, least favourite pastimes is sleep. It can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ated in all the activities either it is be tv or sleep. Moreover, France is lookin...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, moreover, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03614457831 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79390810248 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2991040819 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0698506233637 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282641156548 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480806322486 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470252411317 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449107631135 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.