The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant .
Given is the table indicating striking differences between the number of native speaker and the number of speakers as an additional language of the total speakers' figure estimated among 6 different languages. Overally, apart from English, the 5 other languages have a higher quantity of native speakers than the number of speakers learn languages as their option. In addition, the data of table can be divided into 3 bands depends on the similarities among the sum of speaker.
In the top band, Madarin Chinese completely nominated the others with the total speakers of 1090 million, which was followed by English with the total number of speakers of 942 million. While the number of people use Madarin Chinese as a native language outweighed the others with 900 million, number of native English only accounted for one-third of the total number with 339 million. Stood on the top was the sum of people learn English as their option which was three times higher than that of Madarin Chinese.
In the middle band, Hindi and Spanish had nearly the same of total figure of talkers ( 490 and 420 million respectively). Moreover Spanish had the number of native speakers of 350 million which was 5 times as many speakers as the additional language (70 million).
In the bottom band, not only did Arabic and Portuguese have a quite analogous quantity of total speakers with 230 and 214 million in turn, but both also stood at the bottom with 206 and 203 million of native speakers. Howerver, figure of people choosing Arabic as an addition language was almost 2,5 times more than that of Portuguese.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Given is the table indicating striking differences between the number ...
^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arly the same of total figure of talkers 490 and 420 million respectively. Moreov...
^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...kers 490 and 420 million respectively. Moreover Spanish had the number of native speake...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, third, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49125769109 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.91991778 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149664945629 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730865502239 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469066358046 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103229243865 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385612221005 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.