The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows data on the different systems of underground railway in big cities namely London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles. Overall, a large number of passengers get to the stations which were operated in earlier periods, particularly London, Paris, and Tokyo.
It can be seen that London’s underground railroad system; which was opened in 1863 with the longest route, 394 km, attracts scores of travellers, at 775 million annually. Afterwards, in 1900, another system in Paris was put in action with just half of London’s route, 199 km; however, the passengers’ figure of this system amounts to 1191 million. Interestingly, in the case of Tokyo, the number heads the list with 1927 million per year which is far more significant than that of London and Paris.
Meanwhile, the total number of travellers using the remaining systems is recorded at just 239 million yearly. In particular, the system in Washington DC has received 144 million people per year since its opening in 1976. With the limited length of routes, both systems in Kyoto and Los Angeles annually carried the small amount of passengers, at 45 and 50 million respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...on DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles. Overall, a large number of passengers get to the stations which we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers, at 45 and 50 million respectively.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20833333333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87401855229 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651041666667 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8263431403 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0732209416229 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358787300008 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332469222351 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541556537026 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142926244292 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.