The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the given table compares data about the underground railway network in terms of the age of the systems, the length of the systems and the number of passengers served per year in six cities, namely London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles.
Overall, it can be seen clearly from the provided information that the three oldest underground railway systems in London, Paris, and Tokyo had the longest route and could serve significantly the number of passengers. Meanwhile, the three newest underground railway systems in Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles were able to serve not as much as the three oldest ones.
London's underground railway system which was opened in 1863 was the longest route in three cities (London, Paris and Tokyo) but it served only 775 million passengers annually. On the other hand, the underground railway systems in Paris and Tokyo were established later. (in 1900 and 1927) with the length of systems were half of London's (199 and 155 respectively) but it served remarkably more visitors than London. There were 1191 million people were served by Paris’s underground railway system, Tokyo's especially, it had the shortest route though, but served significantly the number of passengers (1927 million passengers).
Even though the underground railway system in Washington DC, was opened in 1976, was the oldest one in the cities (Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles), but it served 144 million passengers, which was tripled than Kyoto’s (45 million passengers) and Los Angeles’s (50 million passengers). Besides, it also was the longest route (126 kilometres) among three of them.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-11 | Adeola Nafisat | 61 | view |
2019-11-23 | Nivedha_palani | 78 | view |
2019-11-22 | marin123 | 78 | view |
2019-11-22 | marin123 | 61 | view |
2019-11-07 | lunanguyen0701 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received fromemployers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 73
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...Paris and Tokyo were established later. in 1900 and 1927 with the length of system...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75552496169 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469696969697 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.0747396413 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142697847778 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748668501332 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472842315823 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104948999122 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445228368966 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.