The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

The given table illustrates data on the underground railway systems in 6 major cities, namely London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles.

Overall, a prominent feature is that the London underground railway system is the oldest and, moreover, has the longest route. The Tokyo underground railway system, on the other hand, serves annually the greatest number of passengers.

In terms of opening date, the network in London came into operation in 1863. Subsequently, between 1990 and 2001, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles inaugurated the underground railway systems.

With regard to the route length, the London network covers 394 kilometres, whereas the Kyoto network covers a mere 11 kilometres. In Washington DC and Tokyo the route length is 126 kilometres and 155 kilometres respectively. Paris has the second largest route, of 199 kilometres, and Los Angeles the second shortest one, of only 28 kilometres.

However, looking at the yearly ridership, the figures are widely different. The underground railway system in Tokyo serves 1927 million passengers per year, followed by the system in Paris, which serves annually 1191 million passengers. The network in London is used by 775 passengers per year, compared to Washington DC, where the figure is significantly lower, at 144 million. The lowest riderships are recorded in Kyoto and Los Angeles, at 45 million and 50 million respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urated the underground railway systems. With regard to the route length, the Lon...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is significantly lower, at 144 million. The lowest riderships are recorded in Kyoto...
^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'second', 'whereas', 'with regard to', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.320754716981 0.268076937826 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.0867924528302 0.116061578633 75% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0679245283019 0.0759168565197 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0415094339623 0.0366838410393 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.101886792453 0.155750635184 65% => OK
Participles: 0.022641509434 0.0379272487307 60% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85511926106 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00754716981132 0.0210936926555 36% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0943396226415 0.0948980150116 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00754716981132 0.00967000014798 78% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1439.0 1161.00487805 124% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.9 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.42410714286 5.90752243213 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73763899035 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.459821428571 0.337110787985 136% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321428571429 0.247514529752 130% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196428571429 0.171178102325 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138392857143 0.112407865282 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85511926106 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.546246751206 100% => OK
Word variations: 50.8551894877 49.3433353143 103% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 8.93414634146 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6666666667 23.0094962315 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.510480108 42.9750493124 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 135.714022679 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.0094962315 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.689975730869 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 50.8095238095 47.7609492067 106% => OK
Elegance: 3.47058823529 2.94281807926 118% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375028053255 0.418131533498 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146281573783 0.181151798455 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102889078479 0.0850326197045 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.681929065273 0.706616315825 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137430893507 0.157042692854 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187151085111 0.228904883108 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075462848382 0.108899403657 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.288717772957 0.367819155151 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0257760433608 0.0812612215331 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272258729579 0.316326947829 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648499357508 0.0921553760075 70% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.08536585366 171% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.