The table below gives the information on consumer spending on different items in five five different countries in 2002.
The table compares three categories of consumer goods and services, in terms of percentages of total spending, in five countries: Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
In general, people in those five nations spent more money on food/drinks/tobacco than on either of the other two categories.
In 2002, consumer expenditure on food/drinks/tobacco was the highest in all five countries. It represented 28.91% and 32.14% of total spending in Ireland and Turkey, respectively. On the other hand, the figures for clothing and footwear were significantly less. They were 9% in Italy, 5.4% in Sweden and around 6% in the remaining three nations. Interestingly, leisure and education saw the least level of spending in all five nations, at just under 5%, with the lowest being a mere 2% in Spain and Ireland each. The highest was 4.35% in Turkey, while Italy and Sweden had nearly the same rate at 3.20% and 3.22% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-31 | tuantransgc | 61 | view |
- The land for parks is wasted and should be used for other purposes Do you agree or disagree 90
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 73
- The table below gives the information on consumer spending on different items in five five different countries in 2002. 61
- Indivudual sports and team sports 89
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13071895425 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14436829722 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9165699921 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1653168323 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674990231353 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674611083149 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115906650074 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409808450865 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.