The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

The given table shows how people spent on each category in five countries in 2002, consists of Ireland,
Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey. Also, the categories are divided into three groups, Food/Drinks/Tobacco,
Clothing/Footwear and Leisure/Education.

The biggest part of spending by every country were on Food/Drinks/Tobacco category.
It is apparent that Ireland and Turkey had the highest percentage at 28.91% and 32.14% respectively,
and Sweden had the lowest at 15.77%, the rest countries were only around 15-18% approximately.

Following by Clothing/Footwear had less number from the first category by 2-3 times, as well there were a little
different in trend, every country spent around 5-7% under this category except Italy, 9% of their consumer expenditure
were spent by Italian which was the highest by this group.

Next, Leisure/Education is the smallest category that people spent on 2002. Around 2-4% were spend on this group whereas
Turkish was highest and Spanish was lowest at 4.35% and 1.98% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... into three groups, Food/Drinks/Tobacco, Clothing/Footwear and Leisure/Education....
^^^
Line 6, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntage at 28.91% and 32.14% respectively, and Sweden had the lowest at 15.77%, the...
^^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 2-3 times, as well there were a little different in trend, every country spent ...
^^^
Line 10, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Italy, 9% of their consumer expenditure were spent by Italian which was the high...
^^^
Line 13, column 89, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... that people spent on 2002. Around 2-4% were spend on this group whereas Turkish w...
^^^^
Line 13, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... people spent on 2002. Around 2-4% were spend on this group whereas Turkish was hig...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 2-4% were spend on this group whereas Turkish was highest and Spanish was lowe...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66878980892 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45603475595 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636942675159 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.844756982 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139052412341 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637830736066 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479895938251 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504020277309 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665250334677 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.