The table below gives information on consumers spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The provided table illustrates the proportion of money
spent by consumers on three different genere of items
in five distinct nations namely Ireland, Italy, Spain,
Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
As it is presented in table, people in Turkey were more
fond of food, drink and tobacco followed by Ireland
and the expenditure was recorded nearly one-third in
both the countries. On the other hand, other countries
invested less than two- fift for the same purpose.
Conversly, least money was spent on leisure and edu‐
cation, which was accounted for under 5% for all the
countries, however highest ( 4.35%) money was spend
by Turkey, which was double that of spain( 1.98%).
In terms of clothing and footwear, the outlay for these
items were at 9% in Italy and 5.40% in Sweden. The
national expenditure in this area for the remaining
nations was averaged arround 6%.
Overall, it is explicitly seen that maximum amount of
money was spent on food, drinks and tabacco by all
five countries. While, lowest spending was seen in the
category of leisure and education. However, outlay
of Turkey was generally higher than the other four nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...o- fift for the same purpose. Conversly, least money was spent on leisure and edu‐ ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for all the countries, however highest 4.35% money was spend by Turkey, which ...
^^
Line 12, column 45, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...tries, however highest 4.35% money was spend by Turkey, which was double that of sp...
^^^^^
Line 20, column 22, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...nd tabacco by all five countries. While, lowest spending was seen in the category of l...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15263157895 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41934150057 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8500579652 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 3.83414634146 574% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12009769771 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506875097948 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796765333291 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0350042689006 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064649657733 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.