The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 2012

The table provides the information about food consumed per person weekly in a European country in three different years (1992, 2002 and 2012).

Overall, it can be seen that the consumption of vegetables was higher in a proportion throughout the period. Additionally, cheese was less preferred by the Europeans.

Moving on to the more detail, the cheese ingested by Europeans was same in proportion in the year 2002 and 2012 (125 grams and 125 grams respectively). However, the highest amount of food was eaten by European citizens was vegetables in 2012 (2220 grams). In addition, 1148 grams of meat were cosumed in 1992 and subsequently, consumption slightly inclined to 1211 grams in 2002. Finally, in 2012, there was a gradual fall in consuming of meat by almost 100 grams in 2012.

The table further demonstrates that there was a drastic increase for ingestion of wheat from 837 grams to 977 grams (from the year 1992 to 2012). Moreover, bean was most preferable food in 2012 (590 gms), while cheese was less popular in 1992 with the devour of 113 of grams.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion throughout the period. Additionally, cheese was less preferred by the Europea...
^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...peans. Moving on to the more detail, the cheese ingested by Europeans was sam...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ams and 125 grams respectively. However, the highest amount of food was eaten by ...
^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etables in 2012 2220 grams. In addition, 1148 grams of meat were cosumed in 1992 ...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t were cosumed in 1992 and subsequently, consumption slightly inclined to 1211 gr...
^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...le cheese was less popular in 1992 with the devour of 113 of grams.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86187845304 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68969433258 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6141849396 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299147928691 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131582411783 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139826940379 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21575499347 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179985808725 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.