the table below shows the amount of waste production in 6 different countries over a 20-year period.
The table compares the quantities of waste manufactured in 6 nations during the period from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, US dominated others nations in the amount of waste produced. While the quantities of waste in 5 others countries followed an upward trend, the data of Korea saw a decrease.
In 1980, the amount of waste in US was extremely high at 131 million of tons. This figure was nearly 5 times greater than that of Japan which accounted for 28 million of tons. However, in comparison with US and Japan, the amount of waste in Ireland, Poland and Portugal was trivial with 0.6; 4; 2 million of tons respectively. In this year, no data were recorded in Korea.
Over the next two decades, the waste production in US still increased gradually and reached 192 million of tons in 2000. Similarly, after two decades the waste in Japan kept increasing and doubled in the last year. The period has witnessed a very slightly rise in the amount of waste in 3 nations Ireland, Portugal and Poland which ranged from 5 to 7 tons each. In contrast Korea in 1990 the quantity of Korea was close to that of Japan but then reduced by a half in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... which ranged from 5 to 7 tons each. In contrast Korea in 1990 the quantity of Korea was...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, so, still, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54368932039 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47658466052 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529126213592 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8281579764 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216945093138 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846003340339 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468502690967 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136336186469 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274640025339 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.